" /> The Unofficial Peter O'Toole Pages!: October 2006 Archives

« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 23, 2006

"There's no one better for a dirty old man"

(Sunday Times)

"Peter O’Toole is picking up Oscar momentum as an ageing actor who has a relationship with a 21-year-old girl — though he insists he has nothing in common with his character. JASPER REES meets the man who is still not at all unwell Some 20 people in thick Puffa jackets and clumpy boots crouch behind a wooden sea wall on a shingle beach in Whitstable. Or Islington-on-Sea, to give it its modern name. The north coast of Kent glitters in the sun, but this is the coldest week of the winter. Across the Medway, you can see the contours of Essex in stark outline. The shelled-out husk of a matinee idol, silver mane flying wildly in the bitter wind, hobbles to his mark on the other side of the sea wall. He is on crutches after breaking a hip in a Christmas tumble. When the first assistant director calls “Action!”, Peter O’Toole begins to play out his last scene on the last day of the shoot in probably the last leading role he will ever have.You don’t need to be a sentimentalist to note the significance of this moment. The film is called Venus, and it is about a beautiful actor growing undignifyingly old. In an idealised story of O’Toole’s life, this would be the natural terminus to a career that began 44 years earlier with that prophetic credit, “And introducing Peter O’Toole as TE Lawrence”. He carried all before him in the 1960s. But he won the last of his seven Oscar nominations in 1982 for My Favorite Year, in which he played a washed-up swashbuckler who can’t be trusted to turn up on set sober. His most successful role since, as the celebrated tippler in Jeffrey Bernard Is Unwell, also played on the perception that he, too, is fond of a drink.When O’Toole reprised the part at the Old Vic in 1999, it was his way of bidding farewell to the theatre and laying to rest the ghost of his infamous Macbeth on the same stage, which even he concedes was “one of the great, great first-night disasters. Anything that can go wrong in that play will go wrong and did for us. There’s a whole school of thought that I did it deliberately. But in Jeffrey Bernard, I was able, at the end of the 20th century, to do a formidable part that was full of energy, of diction, of movement, full of everything I used to be able to do. I don’t want to shuffle on stage as a butler”.For O’Toole’s admirers, their favourite year will always be 1962, when he embodied in Lawrence the fascinating ambiguities of a man terrified by his own moral passion. Who would have thought he could still hold together a movie in 2006? Only he himself. Three years ago, when the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences chose to confer on him an honorary Oscar, initially he turned it down. “I’m still in the game,” was his magnificent retort. After all those near misses, to pass up on the offer of a free statuette — this showed the steely resolve of a high roller. His last truly great film performance was in The Last Emperor, in 1987. After that, there have been several emperors, plus kings, dukes, lords and knights. But his turn in the spotlight seemed to have been and gone. Troy was still to come, but, O’Toole ruefully admits, it was a rotten effort. “Good script,” he says, shaking his head. “Badly made.”In the end, he went to the Oscars anyway. “It was all right,” he says. “I enjoyed it, and my children were with me. The only thing that wasn’t enjoyable was in the green room. I said, ‘Can I have a drink?’ ‘We have lemon juice, apple juice, still or sparkling.’ I said, ‘No, I want a drink. No drink?’ I said, ‘All right, I’m f***ing off. I’ll be back.’ A man with earphones said, ‘No! No!’ Eventually, this vodka was smuggled in. I had to turn it in for a while and cut down considerably. I still like a drink.”Then, last year, he was sent a script about an old actor who refuses to accept the dying of the light. It could have been written for him. In fact, it wasn’t, although he was mentioned in dispatches early on by writer Hanif Kureishi and director Roger Michell. Their previous film, The Mother, portrayed an older woman’s affair with a much younger man. Although a much warmer work, Venus is its photographic negative. It chronicles the curious, tender, almost wholly platonic romance between Maurice, a jobbing thespian who has been reduced to playing corpses in cheap television dramas, and Jessie, a 21-year-old northern girl (played by Jodie Whittaker), who has been sent to London to tend to her valetudinarian great uncle, Maurice’s old acting mucker (Leslie Phillips). The uncle can’t stand her, but Maurice is charmed by Jessie — or Venus, as he calls her, after the Velazquez he takes her to see at the National Gallery. So he proceeds to charm her back.“I’ve not been in anything quite like this before,” says O’Toole. “As a study of humans cavorting with a finite limit, the script is superb. I thought, wouldn’t it be wonderful if someone really had a go at it, because these anarchic, arbitrary sexual urges are disturbing things, and one copes with them. No one better for a dirty old man who falls for a sluttish young woman. Jodie,” he adds, “is a remarkable young girl. A remarkable young woman, I beg her pardon. She’s a good actress, and she’s game.”She needed to be. Maurice’s sexual interest hits the barrier of Jessie’s revulsion, but slowly, as the characters reveal their vulnerability to each other, she starts to reward him with tiny tokens of favour. She bares her breasts for him when he’s ill in bed and, in a scene only Kureishi would dare write, she slips a finger between her legs and allows him to smell, although naturally he wants to taste, too. “Oh boy,” says O’Toole when reminded of it.Venus is the antidote to all those market-driven Hollywood films that posit as entirely normal the idea of a pensioner copping off with a woman young enough to be his granddaughter. It’s inevitable some people aren’t going to like the sheer honesty of it. “The film,” replies its 74-year-old star, “is an examination of whatever statement anybody may make about that.”I meet O’Toole at a photoshoot. He and Whittaker, a no-nonsense Huddersfield girl (O’Toole grew up in Leeds) fresh out of drama college, are evidently close. After the shoot, they sit down for a quiet chat — he on a chair, she on his knee. I ask him if, in real life, he were to meet a 21-year-old... “I’ve done that,” he interrupts, and slips wistfully into Shakespeare. “In delay there lies no plenty, Then come kiss me, Sweet and twenty, Youth’s a stuff will not endure.”Of course, nobody knows this better. He and Richard Burton once went to see their 1964 film Becket, “to watch ourselves 20 years after the event. Richard said, ‘We want to watch the disintegration of our flesh.’ That’s what you start doing if you start making movies in your twenties. Lawrence of Arabia, for example: I was 27, 28, when it began and 29, 30 when it finished. Two years is a long time. So I can see the decomposition of the flesh. You can’t see it, but I can”.But Burton died before he could entirely wither. In Venus, Kureishi and Michell make capital from the collective memory of O’Toole’s stolen beauty. “My God, how handsome you were,” says Vanessa Redgrave, playing his former wife, when one of Maurice’s old films comes on the television. Coincidentally, How to Steal a Million was on soon after I met him, and even in a frothy romantic comedy, William Wyler knew exactly how to introduce his leading man: with a close-up of those preternaturally blue eyes. They are now the only remnant of the Adonis who freed Arabia, and their owner is inclined to make light of them.“An optical illusion, eyes. The sun is amazingly powerful, the pupils shrink to tiny little pinpoints, like a cat. And if you’ve got dark all round them, you’ve got these terrible old things glaring at you. They look as if they’re doing deep and penetrating and mystical and strange thoughts, but, in fact, they’re thinking about maybe a touch of claret about sevenish and a piece of haddock.” I half-suspect him of choosing the rather garish sky-blue slacks he changes into after the photoshoot as a sort of visual pun on his famous peepers.Unlike some actors, he seems quite happy to watch his old films. “I invited myself along to a showing of Lawrence of Arabia at the Imperial War Museum less than a year ago.” As for The Lion in Winter, he watches it “from time to time. I saw it a few years back, but the print was off, so I left”. He caught a bit of My Favorite Year on television a while back, “and it’s very good”. Does it not feel like having his life flash in front of him? “No, it doesn’t work like that at all,” he says. “You learn very early, or you learn never, if you’re an actor. You sit in front of that mirror at the Theatre Royal, Bristol, in 1958 and learn that that is the meat.” He pulls at his face. “You can’t be self-conscious about it. If you are, you’re dead. The rest is self-consciousness and nightmare. I’ve watched actors I know — who are not really actors, but they get away with it in the movies — and they spend their life not being able to bear their profile, poor sods. It’s the vain who get f***ed up. I’ve never thought about it.”O’Toole is not an easy man to talk to, at least about himself and his work. He is not prone to self-analysis and is resistant to the idea that he and Maurice have much in common. “In what regard? We obviously do the same job.” A refusal to grow old? “I am old! I know my age, I know my limitations. He knew his age and his limitations. That’s one of the reasons we like him.” All right, then: the positive outlook, the sunny disposition? “No, that’s not me. I’m a ratty old bugger.” He is mistrustful of the idea that Venus could in any way be seen as a landmark in his career. “No, no,” he says. “It’s another good job. Last year, I played a blinder on television in Casanova. And I do movies. That’s not bad.” He has since gone back to cameos, playing the king in a film called Stardust, directed by Matthew Vaughn. But the extraordinary daring of Venus feels like the perfect book end to his golden-haired desert warrior, right down to Maurice’s quotation from Macbeth (“Is this a dagger...”).His producer, Kevin Loader, draws me aside and says he’s “not sure if Peter understands that nowadays, winning an Oscar is like running for office”. I pass this on to O’Toole. “They always were!” he says. “Always. Don’t forget, the best thing if you want to know who’s going to win the Oscar is to ring the Las Vegas bookies, because there are 100 members of the Screen Actors Guild who back horses. It’s what I’ve done since 1962.” Did he ever put a bet on himself? “Only once, because I was favourite, and I thought I might do it. I’ve always been an outsider.” "

October 20, 2006

O'Toole at London Film Fest

venus6b.jpg

Note: plenty of nice shots of O'Toole's arrival at the London Film Festival at GettyImages.com.

O'Toole sees 'Venus' for first time at London Fest

Peter O'Toole dashed all rumors of poor health by showing up Thursday night — looking dashing and chipper, no less — at a fete for "Venus" at the London Film Festival. Admittedly, he appeared a bit feeble, too, but also frisky and happy to be there.Never known to miss a round of free drinks with pals, O'Toole attended a cocktail reception held at the National Gallery, which was the setting for a key scene that gave the film its title. In it, O'Toole's character takes the sassy young tart he lusts after (Jodie Whittaker) to see a painting that makes him think of her: Velazquez's portrait of Venus.O'Toole and Whittaker hung out a lot at the gala, laughing and chatting with costars Richard Griffiths and Leslie Phillips plus distinguished guests like London mayor Ken Livingston. Then O'Toole attended a screening of "Venus," seeing for the first time. Immediately afterward, he embraced director Roger Michell, congratulated him enthusiastically and told the audience how much he loved the film.This was the first public outing for O'Toole since he canceled his scheduled appearance at the Toronto Film Festival at the last minute in early September, blaming an attack of "gastric nasties." Since then he's conducted phone interviews with the L.A. Times and Esquire and conducted a satellite press tour from London with members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association in Los Angeles. He will skip the premiere of "Venus" at the American Film Institute festival in L.A. in early November, but plans to spend significant time in Oscarland in January and February.

Venus - review by timesonline's Wendy Ide

ROGER MICHELL’S latest film is, first of all, a love letter to youth. But if there’s a covert affair happening on the side, it’s with London, a city that many film-makers inhabit but which the director clearly cherishes.Venus is Michell’s second collaboration with the writer Hanif Kureishi, after The Mother, and the two films bear superficial similarities. Both deal with that bothersome issue of sexuality — where society would prefer to pretend that it didn’t exist — in those whom old age has stripped of their visibility and, in the case of Venus’s raffish protagonist Maurice, even the ability to perform. But while The Mother was a colder, more clinical film, Venus is steeped in bittersweet romantic yearning.Peter O’Toole is clearly having a whale of a time as the veteran actor Maurice, an incorrigible rogue who has trouble accepting that he is several decades past his sell-by date. His daily highlight is a breakfast of fading champions in a Kentish Town café. He barters a smorgasbord of prescription pills over tea and toast with Ian (Leslie Phillips), a finicky old luvvie clinging to the dusty laurels of “his Caesar” from half a lifetime ago. Their exchanges are delicious: bitchy backstage banter that is as effortless to these half-forgotten stage legends as hitting their marks.When Ian’s grand-niece comes to visit, he entertains hopes that she might be able to rustle up a nice bit of fish for him every evening. He is to be deeply disappointed. Maurice, however, is thrilled with the new addition to his circle. Jessie (the newcomer Jodie Whittaker) is sullen, inarticulate, aggressive and, despite herself, slightly intrigued by this raddled old roué. She makes him feel alive again. He rediscovers his city — the galleries, the Thames, the bars sticky with spilt Bacardi Breezers — through her eyes. He allows himself to fall in love a little, not so much with her, perhaps, as with what she helps him to remember about himself.Maurice is a gift of a role for O’Toole. He is both irreverently playful and profoundly affecting. Whittaker has a tougher job. Not only is she pitched in at the deep end opposite a cast of national treasures, but she also has to work with a character that seems rather underwritten. Jessie is the one character that you feel that Michell and Kureishi had trouble getting to know. Initially, she’s a bundle of antisocial teenager tropes — pot noodles and alcopops; tattoos and tarty gear — a one-woman demonstration of an old man’s grumble about what’s wrong with youth today. If we warm to her by the end of the film, that’s largely due to Whittaker’s sterling work in bringing Jessie in a convincing arc without losing her bolshie, abrasive essence along the way.

One foot in the door, the other in the grave
By Derek Malcolm, Evening Standard

Any film with Peter O'Toole and Leslie Phillips as Maurice and Ian, two eccentric veterans of the stage, old friends who josh each other in semi-retirement, ought at least to have a modicum of entertainment in it.And Roger Michell and Hanif Kureishi's comedy about the awkward late autumn of life, when you can't do what you'd like to and don't like doing what you can, certainly has that.O'Toole and Phillips know exactly how to make the most of good lines and how to mask poor dialogue. And it isn't their fault that this curious mixture of sentimentality and sharpness ends up seeming more than a trifle glib.It's partly because, in trying for something deeper than facile and rather patronising laughs at aged cantankerousness, neither the writing nor direction are quite up to it.The arrival from the provinces of Jessie (Jodie Whittaker), Ian's pretty grand-niece, who proves hopeless at looking after him, prompts Ian to scream but Maurice to take a kinder view of the girl.He sets out to show her the cultural sights of London and, in doing so, grows fond of rather more than her innocent nature. She allows him a few liberties but gives him a good dig in the ribs if he starts to grope.Vanessa Redgrave plays his presumably estranged wife and the straightest of bats throughout as Maurice falls deeper and deeper before realising that he can't and shouldn't win this particular game of love.The film slides queasily around in this emotional and sexual morass until it finally comes to rest as the Grim Reaper beckons and the girl learns that Maurice has taught her a bit about life.But even performances as good as these - and one would certainly include Whittaker as well as the two better-known stars - can't transcend material that hovers between near farce and tragi-comedy without ever landing on a convincing level. Just to watch its actors, however, may well suffice for some.

October 17, 2006

One Night with the King

Heh... Not surprisingly, non-Christian media aren't giving One Night With The King good reviews. While the film, produced by a Christian group and marketed directly to the faithful (like The Passion of the Christ was), did quite well at the box office (9th place for its opening weekend, $4.3 million gross), edging out Jackass Number Two.

O'Toole's role in the film is limited a brief appearance in the film's prologue.

---

In other news, O'Toole was recognized in a poll by GQ Magazine for his role in "How to Steal a Million", voted the 7th most stylish film of all time by the lifestyle magazine's readers. Cary Grant took the nod for #1 in "North by Northwest".
from the article:

"In his prime, Peter O'Toole was a picture of precision. He was the actor that every man wanted to be and none had a chance of becoming."And he never looked more dashing than in this film." He is so immaculate, says GQ that you almost fail to notice Audrey Hepburn, elegant as ever in head to toe Givenchy."

October 10, 2006

More Venus Oscar Hopes for O'Toole...

UPI: 'Venus' may give O'Toole an Oscar shot

"LOS ANGELES, Oct. 8 (UPI) -- The new film "Venus" may give legendary Irish actor Peter O'Toole another shot at winning the Oscar that has eluded him throughout his career.The 74-year-old actor, who has been nominated for an Oscar seven times but has never won, plays an aging actor in the new Disney film. The studio is banking on his "codger power" to garner him the elusive award, said the Sunday Times of London."We shall be getting out the old codger vote for Peter this time around," one Disney exec said. "Peter does not star in many films these days, but everyone remembers him as a glorious roaring boy who has been criminally overlooked. It's time to put that right."Three years ago, the famed Irish actor was to be presented with a lifetime Oscar, but asked the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to defer the honor until he was 80, because he is "still in the game and might win the lovely bugger outright."O'Toole eventually decided to attend the awards ceremony and receive his honorary award.Disney plans to release "Venus" two weeks prior to the Oscar nomination deadline in December."

Mickey News: Disney goes grey to win Oscar for O'Toole

"DISNEY is turning to "codger power" in an attempt to win an Oscar for Peter O'Toole, the 74-year-old actor who has been nominated seven times and has yet to pick up a best actor statuette.O'Toole, the star of classics such as Lawrence of Arabia, The Lion in Winter and The Ruling Class, has received critical plaudits for his latest film, Venus, in which he plays an ageing thespian besotted with a young visitor, played by newcomer Jodie Whittaker.Three years ago the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences decided to give the Irish actor a lifetime Oscar. Although "enchanted", he asked them to defer it until he was past 80, adding: "I am still in the game and may still win the lovely bugger outright."O'Toole's failure to win after so many nominations, a record shared with his old drinking buddy Richard Burton, remains as embarrassing to the academy as its failure to hand the trophy to directors such as Alfred Hitchcock and Martin Scorsese."We shall be getting out the old codger vote for Peter this time around," said a Disney executive last week. "Peter does not star in many films these days, but everyone remembers him as a glorious roaring boy who has been criminally overlooked. It's time to put that right."Fine acting is not enough. Disney-owned Miramax, which will release Venus in the United States two weeks before the Oscar nomination deadline at the end of December, is planning "something special" to reach a third of the 6,000 Oscar voters estimated to be of pensionable age.This will include screenings at the Motion Picture Country House in Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, an academy-financed retirement home where dozens of O'Toole's contemporaries live.O'Toole, a notorious womaniser when in his prime, has praised the "wonderful role" he plays in Venus. "Four years ago I said out loud I wished someone would be brave enough to write such a politically incorrect role for me, about an older man and a younger woman, because I know such things happen all the time. It makes such a change from being the token geriatric," he said.O'Toole remains determined to grow old in his own inimitable style. "The only exercise I get is following the coffins of friends who exercised," he said recently."